Posts Tagged ‘stem cell controversy’

What You Should Know About The Stem Cell Research Controversy

Saturday, July 18th, 2009

stem cell controversy

One of the first things President Barack Obama did upon taking office was lift the controversial ban on stem cell research. The National Institute of Health informs us that human stem cells are very important to scientific research because they have the potential to differentiate into almost any type of cell, tissue or organ in the body. Additionally, stem cell therapies may make it possible for humans to regenerate damaged parts of their own bodies more naturally, without using artificial materials or drugs. In the future, scientists hope to treat cancer, Parkinson’s, heart disease and diabetes with stem cells.

In an embryo that is just three days old, stem cells are found that will later transform into the heart, lungs, skin, tissues, bone marrow, muscle and brain. Advocates of stem cell research believe that there may be a way to generate replacement cells for parts of the body lost through injury, disease or aging. What makes stemcells different than blood, muscle or nerve cells is their innate ability to replicate for months in a laboratory setting. Scientists are hopeful about the potential for long term rejuvenation using these self-renewing human stem cells.

There are two varieties used in modern stem cell research: stem cells embryonic and stem cells adult. Embryonic stem cells are cultivated in a Petri dish from in vitro fertilization. This type of stem cell is extremely versatile and can differentiate into more than 220 cell types in the body for more than a year in a research setting, which is promising for many future medical treatments. Scientists are still trying to understand why embryonic cells are so much more flexible than adult stem cells. Some Americans feel it is inherently wrong to tamper with human cells, by creating, manipulating and destroying fertilized cells that could otherwise continue to grow into human life within a host.

While stem cell research has been full of controversy in America, other nations, notably Iran, have nothing against stem cell research at all. “Policies that may be classified as liberal in the American political system seem to be common sense to Iranian politicians,” explains Hassan Ashktorab of the Howard University Cancer Center in Washington, DC. While George W. Bush banned research on fetal stem cells, Iran’s Ayatollah Khamenei embraced the modern science. While human cloning is still condemned in Iranian culture, they believe it is their duty to do their best to prevent illness and protect human life.

An Overview Of The Pros And Cons Of Adult Stem Cells

Sunday, July 5th, 2009

stemcells

There’s good news and bad news about adult stem cells. The good news is that human trials are officially here for adult stem cell research. As of April 1, 2009, the first stroke patient was treated with his own stem cells. The bad news is that even if his treatment proves to be successful, researchers will still be prompted to run Phase II trials and Phase III trials to determine long-term safety. It could be another 10 years before stem cell therapies are FDA-approved for the masses. Even so, the portent for this relatively new field of medicine is rather exciting.

There are some advantages to using adult stem cells over embryo-derived stem cells. For one, adult cells are easier to harvest, as they can come from skin, muscle, bone marrow and fat. Often those treated with their own stem cells will not suffer immune system rejection. It’s also easier to encourage these already specialized cells to differentiate the way the scientists want them to, which is impressive considering they’re still not 100% sure what causes a cell to become a certain organ or tissue. Lastly, donated adult stemcells clear up the stem cell controversy surrounding the destruction of human embryos in the name of science.

Mice are not people. We know this. Even so, it’s hard not be excited that the first mouse has successfully regrown muscles and regenerated damaged tissue thanks to adult stem cells. Researchers from the University of New South Wales say the mice were given a gene making them resistant to chemotherapy, which clears out damaged cells and encourages new stem cells to take hold. “What has been the realm of science fiction is looking more and more like the medicine of the future,” said Peter Gunning, one of the study’s co-authors.

What moral grounds are scientists subject to adhere to? This is one of the controversies surrounding adult stem cells. Once techniques for creating a new stem cell are in place, who’s to say the scientist won’t fall naturally into therapeutic cloning or even human cloning? If a human can regrow a limb like a salamander, will there be some so curious as to create a human-animal hybrid? Is there a danger in manipulating germs, diseases and mutagens in Petri dishes that could lead to more resistant strains? Will researchers exercise enough patience to ensure the long-term safety of their products containing human stem cells? Can our earth sustain a population that can live even longer and regenerate? To what extent are we playing God?