Posts Tagged ‘security’

Are Body Inspections More Hazardous Than The Feds Declare?

Thursday, December 9th, 2010

downs

I’M FROM THE GOVERNMENT…

The intelligent statement of President Ronald Reagan, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help you.’” come to my thoughts as soon as I think about the mounting din regarding the Transportation Security Administration’s recent procedure of full body scanning airport users.

ELEVATED DOSES OF RADIATION FROM TSA BODY SCANNERS A BASIS FOR CONCERN

A faction of experts uttered their unease to Obama’s science and technology adviser John Holdren. Dr. John W. Sedat, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus in the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, UC, San Francisco and a member of the National Academy of Sciences, in a well-thought-out memo was joined by three other similarly credentialed faculty members in expressing their concerns in that letter dated April 6, 2010. In that letter they articulated “concerns about the potential serious health risks” about the “the dose to the skin may be dangerously high” that the Transportation Safety Administration is subjecting passengers too at airports across the USA.. In that dispatch they pointed out that radiation boosts cancer consequences by harming the DNA and various components within the cells. 

WHAT THE RADIATION INVADES, NOT THE DOSAGE, MAKES THE DIFFERENCE

The scanners the Transportation Safety Administration operates concentrate the largest part of the energy on the surface of the skin and go through a few millimeters into the skin. The anxiety is that there are a quantity of very radiation-sensitive tissues close to the skin such as testes, eyes, and circulating blood.

When this is taken into account, it looks illusory to assert that the amount being administered is a thousand times less than a chest X-ray, or, that it is considerably less than what air travelers are exposed to in-flight. It is the amount of the tissue exposed that matters when the effects of radiation are evaluated.

ARE YOU, OR SOMEONE YOU HAVE AFFECTION FOR, IN ONE OF THESE GROUPS?

New borns, little kids, pregnant women, the elderly, people having impaired immunity (those with HIV infection, cancer patients, people with immune deficiency disorders, and people with defective DNA repair mechanism are a number of groups of people that are at a more elevated risk than the general public. At this time the TSA is not differentiating between these groups based on the risks.

Seniors are also in a individual group when it comes to radiation exposure. Their DNA accumulates a substantial quantity of unrepaired harm, to the point where even small doses of radiation can start the occurrence of skin cancers, including melanoma which which could become life threatening. Exposing their eyes to low doses of radiation is also a concern, since exposure to radiation can boost their danger of developing cataracts.

YOU CANNOT PUT OUR TRUST IN THE PROFESSIONALS

Consider when the American College of Radiology assured us that the CT scans were safe and sound and that the radiation was equal to one chest X-ray. At the present we have learned that the dose that is in a CT scan is equal to 1,000 chest X-rays. Based on the past, it can pretty much be predicted that when the real effects of these full body scanners on wellbeing become identified, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano and the rest of the “officials” who insist the scanners are safe and sound will no longer be around.

Green Sales Software For Banks & Hedge Funds

Monday, May 10th, 2010

Environmentally friendly business communications & sales software.


Pieces of paper? Not anymore.

Sendside can easily replace all kinds of environmentally damaging paper mail, credit union and bank documents, information, contracts, business sheets… anything which will be  already sent through wasteful and slow paper mail can now be delivered by Sendside.

Precisely how damaging is regular paper mail?

  • 60% of dump waste materials is actually paper mail.
  • 100 million trees in the US are clear cut to generate paper mail each year – this is the same as clear cutting the Rocky Mountain National Park every four months.
  • 260,000 houses may be heated with only one day’s production of junk paper mail.
  • Environmentally friendly sales automation software can eliminate huge amounts of printed sales and marketing collateral.
  • Just 1 annual output and removal of junk mail consumes a bit more power than 3 or more million cars or trucks.

New software solutions replaces almost all these environmentally damaging inefficiencies. We do not plan to change homemade cards and letters coming from anyone’s Mom, but we do need to upgrade the huge amounts of surface mail which is generated due to the fact right now there hasn’t already been an potent and protected means of transmitting it over the internet.

E-mail squanders energy

After you send out a file by means of email, that file flows to a Internet Service Provider (ISP), through the internet, through the recipient’s ISP and finally towards the recipient. In each and every ‘node’ along the route, this email is actually copied as well as put into storage leading to an ever improving explosion of duplicates and backup copies. And so the 1 report you emailed is probably replicated and stashed something like 20 times prior to when it actually gets to its recipients inbox. In the event that there’s a answer back it goes through the same process all over again. Send out a 10MB record to twelve people and it may possibly add to the overall ‘size’ on the whole system by a thousand instances.

All of which information needs to be filed. These machines need to be constructed. The building which houses these computers is required to be air-conditioned. Power will have to be used to work the whole thing. While the cost of bandwidth is actually getting smaller, the actual hard expenses related to that rapid duplication of this data isn’t. The entire environmental cost is incredible.

Sendside is totally environmentally friendly: Once you electronically send a message with an attachment, the grateful recipients all receive the email and a ‘link’ into the attached file. The actual included file is not sent before the receiver ‘downloads’ the document. There isn’t any duplication. The record is not copied through all of these ‘nodes’ and is exclusively served if and when needed. So a 100MB file on a Sendside communication is always just 100MB, even in the event you post it again to one thousand individuals.

Discover green business communications for banks and credit unions and sales software.