Apart from New Jersey, all U.S. states other than New Jersey.Consequently of the final state to deem stun gun use means its permitted use has been drastically limited.Because of limit ability it is hardly a viable option. However the mass of regulations involved, police officers are more than likely to chose their handgun instead of crossing the boundaries associated with the utilization of stun guns.
Stun gun availability limited
One particular limit with the policy of New Jersey is that cities or towns that have fewer than 25,000 residents will only have one officer empowered to carry a stun gun. Because that officer cannot be in more than one place at any given time there is a significant chance that situations that should not need to escalate to lethal force will unfortunately rise to that level.
If stun guns are meant to decrease the number of fatalities and/or injuries in police events then it makes no sense to set such an extreme limit on the number of stun guns available to the police. New Jersey’s Star-Ledger makes the important point that police officers who have not earned the trust to acquire and carry a non-lethal weapon are all as a result carrying guns - but if you trust the officers with lethal weapons such as a gun then why not non-lethal weapons such as a stun gun?
Rapid Police Decisions on Stun Gun Optimization
Police officers have been taught to make split second decisions in problematic situations and yet what with the rules and regulations attached to stun guns in New Jersey this ultimately makes a tense situation even more complex. Usage is permitted upon the mentally ill, for example, a difficult diagnosis to make in the middle of an incident, but not to prevent a suspect from fleeing, to keep a suspect compliant, or to prevent property damage.
Is it surprising, then, that officers would reach for their handgun, with rules and regulations that are readily understood, rather than the stun gun?
If stun gun usage truly does lower the incidence of fatalities and injuries in police incidents then usage should not be impeded by overcautious government officials.
Tags: home security, non-lethal weapons, personal protection, personal safety, police, regulations, self defense, self improvement, Stun gun